We’re here today to discuss the Marine Corps acquisition system’s actions in meeting the
urgent need to fulfill add-on armor requirements for tactical vehicles in Iraq – specifically HMMWV
underbody armor protection kits.
In February our staff met with senior Office of the Secretary of Defense officials and the
Marine Corps regarding a substantive technical proposal for tactical vehicle underbody armor put
forth by a Gunny Sergeant serving in Iraq. In April, after no action resulted from that meeting, I met
with General Nyland to discuss the continuing threat to Marines in Iraq from mines and IEDs. We
agreed that the availability of steel in Kuwait could be used to satisfy the urgent need to fabricate
and field 650 HMMWV underbody armor kits to the II Marine Expeditionary Force Forward. We
met on April 21, 2005. The contract for the underbody armor kit was signed yesterday. I
understand that deliveries of the underbody armor kits will begin in three weeks and “the job will be
completed in eight weeks.”
So, the question is, given the availability of the material necessary to meet the armoring
requirement, on-hand in Kuwait in April, is four months a realistic time-frame in satisfying the
requirement? We don’t think it is. This hearing is not about the incredible commitment and
professionalism being demonstrated by our Marines on a daily basis in Iraq. This hearing is about
instilling the same sense of urgency, commitment and professionalism back here in Washington
within our acquisition community as our Marines demonstrate everyday in Iraq.
I know the Marine Corps is capable of moving out and getting a job done when it makes up
its mind to do so. Before the deployment of the First Marine Expeditionary Force to Iraq, the Corps
outfitted over three thousand vehicles with first generation armor within three months. That is what
I view as the standard of performance the Corps has established and we applaud the Corps on that
effort.
This is why we find it perplexing that it should take at least four months to begin fielding 650
underbody armor kits when the material was in theater to begin with. With lives on the line
everyday in Iraq, there is no reason for less than a daily, all out effort here at home to provide the
force protection required for our men and women in Iraq.
General Nyland, General Catto, we look forward to hearing your assessment of the
underbody armor kit situation and any suggestions you may have for enhancing the acquisition
process – particularly the timeliness of meeting requirements. Our troops deserve nothing less.
###
http://armedservices.house.gov/